Institutions of sustainable development of forest resources in modern Russia

Козырева Г.Ю.1, Волков А.Д.1
1 Институт экономики Федерального исследовательского центра Карельский научный центр Российской академии наук

Journal paper

(РИНЦ, ВАК)
опубликовать статью | оформить подписку

Volume 9, Number 3 (July-September 2019)

Please, cite as:
Kozyreva G.Yu., Volkov A.D. Instituty ustoychivogo razvitiya lesosyryevyh territoriy sovremennoy Rossii // Ekonomicheskie otnosheniya. – 2019. – Tom 9. – № 3. – S. 2015-2030. – doi: 10.18334/eo.9.3.41007.

Indexed in Russian Science Citation Index: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=41243686
Cited: 4 by 24.01.2023

Abstract:
The study reveals the latent problems of functioning of the institute of forest certification. The principle of social compensation laid down in accordance with its criteria in the economic strategies and practices of forest companies is often not implemented. On the one hand, the low quality of social and human capital hinders the realization of citizens ' rights in forest management, on the other hand, it secretly allows business not to fully fulfill its social role in the development of the territory. An institutional trap is formed. Social compensation is more effective the more actively local communities are involved in the forest management process. However, low social capital is due not so much to the weakening and loss of social ties, but rather to the poor quality of formal institutions and forced marginalization of local communities. The empirical base of the study is the data of economic and sociological surveys of forest resource areas of the Republic of Karelia, implemented in 1997-2018.

Keywords: forest resource areas, sustainable forest management model, forest certification, relations between forest companies and local communities

JEL-classification: Q57, L73, Q56

References:

Baranova N.M. (2017). Vliyanie chelovecheskogo kapitala na ustoychivoe razvitie ekonomiki [An impact of human capital on the sustainable economic development]. National interests: priorities and security. 16 (9). 1641-1655. (in Russian). doi: 10.24891/ni.13.9.1641 .
Becker G.S. (1962). Investment in Human Capital: A Theoretical Analysis The Journal of Political Economy. 70 (2). 9-49.
Bourdieu P. (1987). Choses dites Paris.
Bourdieu P. (1986). The forms of capital Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. 241-258.
Goldin C. (2016). Human Capital Hand. 5-86.
Ilyin I.V (2000). Strategiya ustoychivogo razvitiya v kontekste globalizatsii [Strategy for sustainable development in the context of globalization]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 27: Globalistika i geopolitika. (1-2). 49-65. (in Russian).
Kosov Yu.V. (2002). Genezis kontseptsii ustoychivogo razvitiya [The Genesis of the concept of sustainable development]. Ekologiya i obrazovanie. (1-2). 39-45. (in Russian).
Kozyreva G.B. (2016). Institutsionalnye problemy lesosyrevyh territoriy rossiyskikh regionov [Institutional problems of forest areas of Russian regions]. Economic analysis: theory and practice. (5). 54-63. (in Russian).
Moiseev N.N. (1982). Chelovek, sreda, obschestvo: problemy formalizovannogo opisaniya [People, environment, society: problems of the formalized description] Moskva : Nauka. (in Russian).
Morozova T.V. (2005). Selskie soobschestva Rossii v period rynochnoy transformatsii [The rural community of Russia in the period of market transformation] Petrozavodsk: KarNTs RAN. (in Russian).
Morozova T.V., Kozyreva G.B., Sukharev M.V., Belaya R.V. (2016). Depressivnye territorii Rossii: institutsionalnye modeli razvitiya i metodologicheskie podkhody issledovaniya [Depressive areas of Russia: institutional models of development and methodological approaches for investigation]. Naukovedenie (Science). 8 (1). 1-14. (in Russian). doi: 10.15862/68EVN116 .
Nahapiet J. Ghoshal S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage The Academy of Management Review. 23 (2). 242-266).
Petrov A.P. (1997). Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie lesnym khozyaystvom [State forest management] Moskva . (in Russian).
Petrov A.P. (1995). Ekologicheskaya sertifikatsiya sistem vedeniya lesnogo khozyaystva i lesopolzovaniya [Environmental certification systems of forest management and forest management]. Lesnoe khozyaystvo. (6). 9-20. (in Russian).
Petrov A.P. (2013). Ekonomicheskaya organizatsiya ispolzovaniya lesov Rossii v usloviyakh rynochnyh otnosheniy [Economic organization of forest use in Russia in the conditions of market relations]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta lesa - Lesnoy vestnik. (4). 42-44. (in Russian).
Pisarenko A. I. (2005). Lesnoe khozyaystvo Rossii: ot ispolzovaniya k upravleniyu [Forestry in Russia: from use to management] Moskva : Yurisprudentsiya. (in Russian).
Shubin V. A. (1997). Vsemirnaya lesnaya konventsiya i Lesnoy kodeks Rossii [World forestry Convention and the Forest code of Russia]. Eco. (10). 5-15. (in Russian).
Sukharev M.V. (2012). Kognitivnye protsessy v lokalnom soobschestve [Regional institutional environment and cognitive processes in the local community]. Trudy Karelskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk. (6). 30-34. (in Russian).
Treyvish A.I. (2002). Perekhod k ustoychivomu razvitiyu: globalnyy, regionalnyy i lokalnyy urovni: Zarubezhnyy opyt i problemy Rossii [The transition to sustainable development: global, regional and local levels: Foreign experience and problems of Russia] Moskva . (in Russian).
Vardomskiy L.B. (1999). Problemy ustoychivosti ekonomicheskogo prostranstva Rossii v kontekste vneshneekonomicheskoy liberalizatsii [The problem of stability of Russia's economic space in the context of foreign trade liberalization]. Vneshneekonomicheskie svyazi. 210-240. (in Russian).

Страница обновлена: 15.09.2023 в 00:13:19